New Mexico Can Kill Its Income Tax. It Lacks the Nerve.

New Mexico House Republicans want to zero out the state's personal income tax, and Santa Fe's answer was a $250 rebate check and a lecture about "recurring budget implications."¹ Both sides are having the wrong argument. The question was never whether New Mexico can afford to eliminate the income tax — the state's own numbers say it already earns more from its investments than the tax brings in. The question is whether anyone in the Roundhouse has the discipline to sequence it. Here's what that actually looks like once you get past the press conferences and into the math.

What the Public Hears vs. What's Actually Happening

The narrative runs two ways and both are incomplete. Republicans say "eliminate it now" and wave at the surplus. Democrats call it a "publicity stunt" and warn it'll gut the schools.¹ Neither has shown New Mexicans the one thing that matters: a worked list of how you actually replace $2.1 billion in annual revenue without a single teacher losing a paycheck.²

That's not a hard thing to produce. It's just work nobody in leadership has bothered to put on paper. This piece does — not as a prescription, but as the researched map their offices should have handed the public months ago.

The Real Problem Isn't the $2 Billion. It's the Word "Recurring."

Here's the distinction that reframes the entire debate. The personal income tax generates about $2.1 billion every single year, and it funds things that recur every single year — teacher salaries, the Medicaid match, State Police.² You cannot plug a permanent hole with money you only have once. The GOP plan's answer — "cut one-time spending" — runs straight into that wall.¹

But there's a stunning fact buried in the state's own forecasts that almost nobody has said out loud: New Mexico's investment income has already surpassed what the income tax collects. General fund income from the state's permanent funds and treasury interest hit $2.1 billion — passing personal income tax revenue for the first time — and it's still climbing.³ The machine that could make the income tax obsolete is already running. Leadership just hasn't pointed it at the target.

Don't Cliff It. Phase It.

The Republican bill sets the rate to zero in one shot — the $2.1 billion cliff with no ramp.⁴ That's the amateur version. The disciplined version spreads it over seven years, and the moment you do that, the panic number disappears.

Phase it out over seven years and each year you remove roughly $300 million — just 2.6 percent of the state's $11.3 billion recurring budget.⁵ That's not a shock. That's a rounding error the state moves around every session. And critically, you gate each step to a reserve trigger: a bad oil year pauses the phase-out instead of blowing a hole in the classroom budget.

Where Each Year's $300 Million Actually Comes From

No single lever does it. A stack of modest, real ones does — and the numbers are sourced, not invented:

**A 2 percent agency trim yields about $227 million.**⁵ The state already planned an additional 5 percent cut for FY27 to conform to federal tax changes, so trims at this scale are already in the playbook.⁶
Normal revenue growth adds roughly $106 million, even in the conservative FY27 forecast.²
Those two alone — trim plus growth — total about $332 million, covering the $300 million step *without touching a dime of investment income.*⁵

That's the whole ballgame in one sentence: the pain is real but it's manageable, and it's spread thin enough that no one program takes the hit.

Oil and Gas: The Anchor, Not the Afterthought

New Mexico is the nation's second-largest oil producer, and the honest revenue conversation starts here. A 2025 USGS assessment ranks New Mexico second in the country for undiscovered oil and gas on federal land — roughly 8.9 billion barrels of oil and 85.4 trillion cubic feet of gas, about 30 percent of the nation's undiscovered federal-land oil.⁷ The State Land Office already delivered $362.6 million above normal in FY26 from leasing.⁸

The catch, stated plainly: the big federal acreage is Washington's key to turn, not Santa Fe's. But the state controls its own land leasing outright — and it under-uses it. The play isn't to bet on high prices forever; it's to capture the windfall and invest it into the permanent funds, which are projected to grow toward $47 billion by 2050.⁹ That's how you turn a volatile commodity into a permanent revenue stream. Fuel, not dependency.

The Data Center Boom Is Real Money Santa Fe Is Giving Away

New Mexico is landing some of the largest data center investments in America — Project Jupiter's $165 billion industrial revenue bond in Doña Ana County, Meta's Los Lunas expansion, Green Data's proposed 2 GW campus in Socorro.¹⁰ The demand isn't a fad; AI compute need climbs until compression or a new architecture changes the math, and nothing on the horizon does that soon.¹¹

Here's the uncomfortable part nobody frames honestly: the standard deal is built to erase the company's tax bill. The industrial revenue bond makes the campus property-tax exempt; the 2021 data center deduction wipes out gross receipts tax on the equipment.¹² The state's take comes through negotiated payments in lieu of taxes — Project Jupiter's is about $300 million to one county over 30 years.¹² Real money, but roughly $10 million a year to a single county, not a state windfall.

The lever Santa Fe won't pull: restructure the term sheets. Set escalating PILOT floors tied to compute capacity instead of flat 30-year figures. Trade incentives for guaranteed state-land energy leases that feed the permanent funds. Time the deals so construction gross receipts and the eventual return to the property rolls land inside the phase-out window. The AI boom could help fund the tax cut — if leadership negotiated like it owned something valuable, because it does.

The Nuclear Supply Chain Is Already Here — and Untapped in More Ways Than One

This is the asset most states would kill for and New Mexico treats like a filing cabinet. The state owns links in the nuclear fuel chain the AI buildout will fight over globally:

Eunice (Urenco USA) is the only operating commercial uranium enrichment plant in the United States, producing about a third of national demand — and in June 2026 it announced a roughly 50 percent capacity expansion, now licensed to enrich to the higher-assay fuel next-gen reactors require.¹³
Kairos Power at Los Alamos fabricates TRISO reactor fuel, with an Albuquerque expansion projected to add 100 jobs and about $4.2 billion to the state economy over a decade.¹⁴
The Grants uranium district once out-produced every district in America — and has sat idle with zero production since 2002, despite the Cebolleta project alone holding roughly 20.3 million pounds of resource.¹⁵

Untapped mining. Untapped severance and royalty revenue on a resource the state once led the nation in. And untapped strategic positioning: New Mexico could power SMR-fed data centers with fuel enriched in Eunice and fabricated at Los Alamos — vertical integration no other state can claim.¹³

What About Welfare Cuts? A Trap, and We'll Say So

Someone will ask why not just cut welfare. Because most of it isn't the state's money to cut. Medicaid covers 830,000-plus New Mexicans and runs well over $8 billion, but the state share is only about $1.5 to $1.8 billion — the feds pay the rest, and every state dollar pulls down roughly three to four federal ones.¹⁶ SNAP benefits are 100 percent federal; WIC is a federal grant.¹⁶ Cut $100 million in state Medicaid and you forfeit $300 million-plus in federal money that would have flowed to New Mexico hospitals. That's a net drain, not a gain. The honest angle is efficiency, not the axe: the Legislature's own evaluators found the state stacks income-support programs without moving the poverty needle.¹⁷ Reform for outcomes — not for revenue.

New Mexico Can Afford to Get This Right — and Can Afford a Few Wrong Bets Getting There

Here's the part that should reframe the whole debate. New Mexico is not a state that has to bet the farm. It sits on roughly $60 billion across its two permanent funds, a persistent oil windfall large enough to mail out rebate checks with money left over, and reserves near 30 percent of the budget.³ ⁹ And yet the surplus is already thinning — the FY27 forecast shows just $106 million in "new money" and a $211 million hit to corporate revenue from federal tax changes.² That's not an argument to wait. It's an argument to act before the oil cycle turns, while the cushion is still there to absorb the transition.
Taxes V2.png

The Real Failure Is a Leadership Failure

"Pause and study" requires no judgment call. It's the governance equivalent of never buying a stock because every stock carries risk. For a state with New Mexico's fiscal cushion, that isn't prudence — it's the more reckless choice, because standing still guarantees the income tax keeps taking $2,400 a year from a $60,000 household while Texas next door takes zero.¹⁸

And it's not our job — or the press's — to prove any single one of these avenues will work. That's precisely the point. It's the Governor's job and the Roundhouse's job to show the public they've weighed expanded oil and gas leasing, restructured data center term sheets, a stabilization-fund phase-in, the dormant nuclear supply chain, and targeted trims — and to say, on the record, what landed in the "consider" pile and what landed in the "decline" pile, and why. New Mexicans aren't asking their leaders to guarantee an outcome. They're asking to see the work.

The state doesn't need another study. It has the oil, the land, the permanent funds, the data center pipeline, the nuclear supply chain, and the cash to absorb a few bad bets getting to zero income tax over seven years. What it doesn't have, at least not yet, is anyone in Santa Fe willing to make the call instead of postponing it — and own it.